Ryan focuses on general corporate litigation, closely held business and shareholder litigation, media law, business tort and contract actions, and appeals. He has led a variety of work for both plaintiffs and defendants in creditor-debtor actions, including the administration of assignments for the benefit of creditors; construction suits; trade secret litigation; and real estate disputes. Ryan also has achieved significant appellate victories for clients in the areas of medical malpractice defense, closely held corporations, government contracting, and media law before the Supreme Court of Ohio, intermediate Ohio appellate courts, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. Ryan’s media law practice has involved the recent successful defense of multimillion dollar defamation claims against several media conglomerates. He also has experience in helping clients navigate probate litigation, as well as liquor license and permitting laws in Ohio.
Prior to joining the firm, Ryan worked as a Legal Intern at the University of Deusto in Bilbao, Spain, where he collaborated with prominent scholars at a renowned human rights institute. While attending the University of Cincinnati College of Law, Ryan served as a research assistant to several professors and co-authored an amicus brief to the North Carolina Supreme Court, wrote for and chaired the University of Cincinnati Law Review’s Blog, and served as a Senior Articles Editor on Human Rights Quarterly.
Supreme Court of Ohio
State ex rel. More Bratenahl; Meade v. Village of Bratenahl et al., 157 Ohio St.3d 309, 2019-Ohio-3233, 136 N.E.3d 447 (Ohio 2019) – As counsel for amici curiae Ohio Coalition for Open Government, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, and Ohio Association of Broadcasters, successfully obtained the Supreme Court of Ohio’s unanimous reversal of lower court decisions permitting secret ballot voting in violation of the Ohio Open Records Act, and also obtained in the decision clarification of the fundamental requirement that the public have meaningful access to meetings of public bodies in the state of Ohio.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Hawaii Dept. of Human Services, Div. of Vocational Rehab. v. U.S. Dept. of Education, Rehab. Services Administration, 46 F.4th 1148 (9th Cir. 2022) – Represented the Department of Human Services in a dispute with the United States Army over the priority to be applied to the Department’s state-licensed blind vendors for the award of a multimillion-dollar cafeteria service contract at a Hawaii Army base. From an adverse arbitration decision against the Department, we prosecuted a partially successful appeal to the district court, and then obtained complete success in the Ninth Circuit. The court’s precedential decision resulted in immediate priority for blind vendors in the Army’s cafeteria contracts in Hawaii, and binds the Army and federal agencies to apply the priority for blind persons in awarding these types of contracts across the western U.S.
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Book People v. Wong, 91 F.4th 318 (5th Cir. 2024). Provided successful amici curiae support, contributing to the Fifth Circuit’s ruling that a state statute mandating ratings on library materials violated the First Amendment. Filed on behalf of the Freedom to Read Foundation and the American Association of School Librarians.
Little v. Llano County, 103 F.4th 1140 (5th Cir. July 3, 2024). Provided successful amici curiae support, contributing to the Fifth Circuit’s ruling that a county’s removal of certain books from library shelves violated the First Amendment. Filed on behalf of the Freedom to Read Foundation, Texas Library Association and American Library Association.
Ohio Courts of Appeals
Maas v. Maas, 2020-Ohio-5160, 161 N.E.3d 863 (1st Dist. 2020) – Represented the independent directors of the company against breach of fiduciary duty claims and obtained a complete dismissal of claims at summary judgment. Received a unanimous opinion applying the business judgment rule and affirming that victory on appeal.
Young v. Durrani, et al., 2016-Ohio-5526, 61 N.E.3d 34, (1st Dist. 2016) – successfully argued for application of statute of limitations and constitutionality of state of repose to various medical claims in lead test case against hospitals related to series of allegedly deficient back surgeries.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Quigley v. Detroit Airlines N. Terminal Consortium, Inc., 2023 WL 3668115 (Mich. Ct. App., May 25, 2023) – Successfully obtained interlocutory stay and review of trial court decision denying motion to dismiss in wrongful death action against Schindler Elevator Corporation, which resulted in reversal and remand for trial court to apply court legal standard for dismissal.
University of Cincinnati College of Law, J.D., 2015, summa cum laude
University of Cincinnati Law Review, Blog Chair
Human Rights Quarterly, Senior Articles Editor
Arthur Russell Morgan Fellow
Order of the Coif
Xavier University, B.A., History, 2012, summa cum laude, University Scholar
Supreme Court of Ohio
United States Supreme Court
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Freedom to Read Foundation (FTRF) Roll of Honor Award, 2024. Presented for pro bono work making significant contributions to the First Amendment freedom to read.
2024 Fellow, Leadership Council on Legal Diversity
Selected for inclusion in Ohio Rising Stars®, 2019-2024
Frost Brown Todd Diversity and Inclusion Award, 2016
John R. Sayler Prize in Evidence, 2014
Henry Otterman Real Property Prize, 2013
Lawrence Maxwell Advocacy Prize, 2013
Cincinnati Bar Association
Ohio State Bar Association
Federal Bar Association
Phi Beta Kappa
Cincinnati Observatory, Development Committee
Proud Scholars
St. Ursula Mock Trial Team, Advisor
Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Belonging Committee, Member
Litigation Support Committee, Member
Dueling Federal and State Actions: the Colorado River Doctrine, Frost Brown Todd Website, July 2023
Allegations of Scientific Misconduct Protected as Opinion or Substantially True, Media Law Resource Center, February 2021
The Burden of Applying Casey’s “Undue Burden” Standard, University of Cincinnati Law Review, June 2014
The New Batson Challenge: Extending the Protections of Batson v. Kentucky to Gays and Lesbians, University of Cincinnati Law Review, October 2013
Will Divorce Bring Marriage Equality?, University of Cincinnati Law Review, September 2013
September 27, 2024 | Publications
Frost Brown Todd has collected in one place summaries of notable rulings from the U.S. Supreme Court...
September 26, 2024 | Publications
Murthy v. Missouri, 144 S. Ct. 1972 (June 26, 2024) As any social media user knows, content moderati...
September 26, 2024 | Publications
Moody v. Netchoice, LLC, 144 S. Ct. 2383 (July 1, 2024) In Moody v. Netchoice, LLC, the U.S. Supreme...
January 22, 2024 | Publications
On December 19, 2023, six direct shippers shipping wine and distilled spirits to customers in Tennes...
January 18, 2024 | Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Belonging
Three attorneys from Frost Brown Todd (FBT) have secured spots in the Leadership Council on Legal Di...
August 30, 2023 | Publications
On July 14, 2023, the State of Tennessee filed a complaint against six out-of-state businesses alleg...
August 24, 2023 | Experience
Frost Brown Todd (FBT) recently achieved a significant triumph for the First Amendment and its clien...
August 16, 2023 | Publications
The U.S. Supreme Court issued two decisions in the 2022-23 term that begin to define the limits of l...
July 27, 2023 | Publications
I. The Colorado River Doctrine – Alive and Well Consider the following: two parties to a contract ...
February 28, 2023 | Publications
This article was originally published in Bloomberg Law’s Professional Perspectives. It’s...